a new low in topical enlightenment

Showing posts with label lee abrams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lee abrams. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Issue #68 (October 20, 2010)

Quarry Pond, Naperville, Illinois

Photo by Joe Carducci


















Bring Me the Head of Lee Abrams
by Joe Carducci






A few weeks ago Rebecca Mead wrote a New Yorker ‘Talk of the Town’ bit about The Stooges where she got Iggy to explain how such modern classics as “Fun House” (1970) and “Raw Power” (1973) could have failed so completely in their days:

“It’s like this: I made some fucking great-sounding music that still sounds fucking great, and—to drop my intellect and just get emotional about it—a bunch of fat fucks and pricks wouldn’t play my music anywhere where anybody could hear it, wouldn’t sell it in a part of the store where it could be bought.”


I like to think that Iggy’s “fat fucks” were led by Lee Abrams. (He doesn’t mention the press but I’ll add that I enjoy guessing that Jan Wenner is bringing up the rear in his parade of “pricks”.)

In truth, Abrams was merely beginning in 1970, joining Kent Burkhart who was an AM power having been doing that since the mid-50s as an architect of the post-rock and roll Top 40 format, and leveraging that mature consulting business into the booming, still freeform FM landscape. (FM was only just standard radio equipment in the late sixties after station-owners were forced to stop merely simulcasting on their FM sides.) But the radio nerd stumbled into perhaps THE hippie-era goldmine. The singles market was giving ground to the album market; singles became a way to sell the more expensive albums. And with FM radio in its early years one might not need an actual hit to sell albums; record stores once stocked pop music by chart position only, except for soundtracks, show tunes, and classical records, now the hippies opening record stores were at first stocking records on some kind of cultural merit of all things. But radio station owners were generally straight older folks, conservative-modernist-entrepreneurs, and if they had to program for this wilder and wilder rock culture of the early seventies, they preferred to not need some troublesome company freak on the premises to do the programming. Having programming decisions phoned in was no-muss no-fuss, and soon no-rock and roll a’tall.

Burkhart-Abrams by the end of the seventies told a thousand radios stations what to play. The older AM side of their business did not manage by itself to destroy the Top 40 format. But as older listeners moved to FM, AM radio was left to kids and soon they no longer heard the likes of Jimi Hendrix Experience, Blue Cheer, or Bubble Puppy. Oddly, the freer FM band was easy for Abrams to destroy. As they’d abandoned AM for FM, the hipper ears could leave FM for the new 8-track and audiocassette formats in the car, while at home playing LPs in a stack could give you music by the hour unplugged from any radio culture. By my ear, FM and AM music radio was slowly strangled until by the end of 1973 one just stopped listening. Wired magazine had Abrams “winning 318 programming battles, while losing only 11.” Perhaps there really were eleven good rock stations by the end of the seventies; it didn’t seem like it. “‘It's really a war,’ Abrams says. ‘We're out to bring music back to the people. We have this one opportunity to revolutionize radio, and if we blow it we should all be shot.’ But isn't this the guy who blew it the last time?…” (Oct. 2004, Wired)

The Punk era culture began there then, with that 1973 death of music radio, but I believe the era itself was also an organic creation of that earlier living radio culture. As Iggy explained later about The Stooges’ “Raw Power” album, “A year after I made it, that album was selling for 39 cents, and then two years after that, it was selling for about $39.” (Mar. 15, 1987, Chicago Sun-Times) It was as if broke kids haunting used record stores all bought that album in cut-out in 1974-75, then after their own bands hit vinyl with their self-released 45s, or Sire LPs, the album’s price got bid up as an import. “Raw Power” was the initial template for punk rock before the Ramones’ debut.

By then the Abrams’s chokehold on airplay oxygen was destroying both music radio and the music itself. It needs remembering that the major labels at first did fine in terms of signing most of the more distinctive punk era bands (Patti Smith on Arista; The Dictators on Epic; The Ramones on Sire; Television on Elektra; Pere Ubu on Mercury; The Dickies on A&M…). When you see early photographs and videotape of seventies punk there are the requisite fashion plates with spiked and dyed hair, but there are more bearded hippies and long-haired girls attending than is remembered. There were still music people in the record industry; there weren’t any in the radio business. And soon the larger historied independent labels (A&M, Motown, Chrysalis…) were forced to leave for major distribution to maintain promotional clout as the Abrams centralizing effect played out through the greater industry.

Radio didn’t air the music so the first punk albums failed to sell and further adventurous signings ceased. SST released the equivalent of six or seven albums by Hüsker Dü or the Meat Puppets before they were signed by major labels; that’s insane. How many bands even last that long? Midway through their SST careers the bands managed to get the ears of some of the erstwhile music press and that got us requests for their albums from the major labels. They claimed to dig the bands but as realistic, responsible A&R men, they knew they had to listen with Lee Abrams’ ears and those were simply deaf to the era. Black Flag didn’t want to run a record label, they wanted to sign to a major label in 1978! The New York offices signed most of the first punk bands but the LA offices knew the LA bands from that one non-Abrams station, KROQ, and from local press and the early doc, The Decline of Western Civilization (1980). The LA majors also saw that by 1981 The Germs, X, Black Flag, The Adolescents, and others were selling enough records in the greater SoCal market that if you extrapolated out to the rest of the country they’d be going gold on their debut releases! But the major labels also knew that Lee Abrams was there to stop that all from being conceivable.

Abrams was quite clear about the destruction he’d accomplished by 1980. He’s apparently appeared on several Alan Parsons’ albums, the nadir of engineered musique concrte that these numbers guys created while tripping on drugs left behind by musicians -- it was pod music for pod people, “lifestylers” in the parlance of SST, the perfect wallpaper for the leather couch. Failing to reach Art, the engineers reached only design. Any doubts Lee might’ve had about shit-canning an entire next generation of rock bands were certainly relieved by every new issue of Rolling Stone magazine in those years (1975 - 1991). Unlike Lee, Jan hasn’t come clean, though he is at least out-of-the-closet now, which probably calls for a revisionist book about the magazine and its effect, updating the Robert Sam Anson and Robert Draper books, neither of which really put the musical wood to Mr. Straight Arrow. And its what happened to music that matters. Rolling Stone followed up on later New Journalism through the seventies but it gave up on music.

As Abrams joined XM satellite radio in 2004 he was happy to acknowledge his crimes in the next context of all the miracles of Art he expected to achieve at XM. Unfortunately the hundreds of channels available allowed him just to subdivide the music further. The bastard-child rock and roll that he initially found as a kid on sixties radio humoring R&B, garage rock, C&W, surf, rod, bluebeat, Sinatra, jug band, blues, acid rock, movie themes, folk, et. al., was dissected, drawn-and-quartered, pulled-apart racially, sonically, stylistically, classwise and other ways and then these have been further subdivided at XM and its former competitor Sirius and then beamed down from satellite with the destructive force of those SDI directed energy weapons, only those were theoretical. Good thinking Mr Laser Beam!

Had anyone wanted to make radio a contributor to our music culture once more instead of its tormentor it’s easy enough to locate viable programming mix models from late sixties AM radio, or pre-Abrams early seventies FM radio -- the air checks are available even if the old radio station freaks’ memories are shot. All those winners of the AOR game might have bought a station as C&W stars once did and put its programming philosophy together with a musician’s sense rather than the gonadal drive of coked-out fanboys.

However, the radio business is about advertising, it isn’t about music, and the change in music could be noticed in the eighties and it was real. If you ask me anyone starting a band after 1980 was handicapped by the lack of an immersive exposure to great music by good radio stations. Mediated America no longer allowed provincial folk cultures to develop deeply on the highly refined level they once achieved in Appalachia, Louisiana, the Mississippi Delta, the Piedmont, the border…, so this new airborne folk media was what we had to make do with after WWII. It was quite productive for awhile and great folk media synthesizers like Eddie Cochran, Dick Dale, Steppenwolf, Jimi Hendrix, The Doors, James Blood Ulmer…, made contributions as brilliant and nearly as organic as earlier, more rooted, less mediated folk synthesizers like Hank Williams, Muddy Waters, Bill Haley, Elvis Presley, Chuck Berry…. But it was less sturdy and thereafter, if young kids got turned on to music in junior high and form a band by the end of high school, then the end of great music radio in the early seventies resulted in the end of great bands in the early eighties. The good bands thereafter, even if inspired by their immediate predecessors became more directly derivative, more conceptual and thinner in achievement. (I’m thinking of bands like Social Distortion, Dream Syndicate, The Pixies, Eleventh Dream Day…, vs. those formed earlier such as The Germs, The Sleepers, The Wipers, Black Flag, The Minutemen…) These unsigned and unheard casualties are better known today than they were in their day, and this too is culture damage charged to Lee Abrams, even though no small label releasing such records ever mailed him a copy.

By the late 1980s the slight demographic wind at their back and the slow advance of the new independent label economy through college radio stations, a smaller club circuit, and a new generation of music writer and editor yielded what passed for a watershed radio event where AOR and CHR (FM’s Top 20 format) stations were suddenly forced to play what to them sounded absolutely foreign, Nirvana’s breakthrough single. But by then the music culture of America was dumbed down to the level rather of a media culture; meaning Grunge was as the Twist and it evaporated. Our music culture’s been broken down further of course since then.

So given all this, and the fact that I much prefer to listen to the radio than my record collection, I was interested when the new owner of the Tribune Company, Sam Zell, hired Randy Michaels and Lee Abrams to bring some new thinking from radio to the threatened newspaper business. Zell, a real estate mogul, had owned the Jacor radio chain where he met Michaels (Jacor was the last big competitor chain before Clear Channel bought it and began choking to death). The Trib was our morning paper growing up and I knew of Colonel McCormick from family visits to his former estate Cantigny, named for the town he took part in capturing from the Germans in WWI and earned his Colonelship. By the time I was reading the Tribune it was committed to living down the Colonel’s legacy and playing catch-up to the New York Times and Washington Post by going after Nixon. It was also rejecting more than just McCormick’s small government isolationism, it was joining the American newspaper zeitgeist that Mike Wolff in his semi-admiring portrait of Rupert Murdoch called turning “orderly and genteel.” (The Man Who Owns the News). The Colonel had died in 1955; that was the year Richard J. Daley became mayor. It’s likely that Daley’s performance in 1968 was more on their minds at the Tribune. What’s true is that Daley was considered vulnerable before the 68 Convention but Chicagoans were never going to turn on him after it. But the Tribune was now a reflection of no one person. The Irish in the boardroom were no longer fighters.

The Chicago Tribune was founded by Joseph Medill, McCormick’s grandfather. It was a leader in the industry as both a business, and as cultural organ. And McCormick was involved in everything from setting up the “Gasoline Alley” comic-strip to purchasing land, power and machinery to produce pulp for newsprint in Canada. McCormick and his papers (also the NY Daily News, Washington Times-Herald) walked point in the losing causes that the Tea Party have recently taken up, smaller government, no overseas military involvement (at least in Europe). But he should also be better remembered by the newspaper business. Everyone knew who owned the Chicago Tribune in his day. And I don’t think he’d have had the paper owning newspapers coast-to-coast and then let Gannett found the USA Today, or owning the better part of a national TV network and then let Murdoch found the Fox network. The Tribune might have kept Murdoch, Gannett and the WSJ in their boxes by getting their first if they hadn’t bought into the conventional wisdom about their own history. But they learned that conventional wisdom in j-school, perhaps even the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern -- destruction by duly degreed apparats everywhere you look.

Zell had taken the Tribune Co. private which was probably the thing to do as Wall Street considers news papering a sunset industry and so valuations were down. And that was at the peak of the real estate bubble, so now the resulting bankruptcy agreement is at risk which puts the deal itself in jeopardy. Today’s old guard at the Tribune or in the Chicago media are full of bile for these radio sleazebags that Zell brought in, but they have no answers as the ships go down. They believe they love Chicago and its lore, they think they know about the old Front Page culture, the circulation wars, the press barons… But their pseudo-appreciation for all that life back then is a Butterfly collector’s appreciation of death. Back in 1983 when Ted Field forced his family (Marshall Field & Co.) to sell the Sun-Times so he could go into the destroyed record business (Interscope) with his wallet blazing, it was Rupert Murdoch who bought it and Mike Royko and others whose whole newspapering lives were set against the Tribune resigned and walked across the street and into the Tower the Colonel built. Royko even gave up the White Sox for the Cubs if you can believe that. But Murdoch failed at the Sun-Times, the Midwestern tabloid sensibility is/was not the London or Sydney or New York one, and he sold it to some local group and it’s been resold and survives readably. However, the local attitude, Royko’s included, won-the-day then as their predecessors won it against the Colonel.

Last week after the radio boys etiquette hit the NYT’s front page the new “genteel” j-school suburban bourgie ethos won out over smoking cigars and swearing and sexism and other juvenilia come over from radio minus the rock and roll charm. Combined with this local faux-Chicagological attitude this won out against Chief Innovations Officer Lee Abrams, and this week they won again over Chief Executive Officer Randy Michaels, and soon maybe Sam Zell. And then what? The Colonel and Joe Patterson and Frank Carson and Walter Howey and Charles MacArthur and Hilding Johnson and Jake Lingle and the boys down below all want to know. I want to know and maybe Iggy does too.

Ten years ago Daley’s wife in her drive to beautify the city had the newsstands of the city tore down and hauled away, including the world class shed in front of the old Central Library which some guy who believed in papers had just bought for a hundred grand from some guy who remembered when there were a dozen Chicago dailies and you couldn’t tell the reporters from the criminals from the policemen from the politicians. There weren’t enough parks on the lakefront for Daley himself so he tore up Meigs Field in the middle of the night, probably non-union guys. Now the city’s safe for Lollapalooza no less.

***

postscript

Lee Abrams correcting as many beside-the-points he can think of at huffingtonpost.com.


















Burbank and the East San Fernando Valley, from Cahuenga Peak

Photo by Chris Collins



















Parus Caeruleus, by James Fotopoulos


















From the Kroehler Desk of Joe Carducci…


John Kass in the CT, "Fast Eddie?"

“The thing to remember about Vrdolyak -- once prince of the city and master of the Chicago Way of politics -- is that yes, he's a grandfather and loves his family, but wolves also love their packs. In sentencing Vrdolyak to 10 months in federal prison for his role in a $1.5 million real estate kickback scheme, Judge Kennelly said there were ‘two sides’ to Fast Eddie. ‘Mr. Vrdolyak has acted in a venal way, an unethical way, and he has acted as a criminal,’ said Kennelly. ‘But he's also gone above and beyond to help people who needed his help.’


The people who wrote the judge for mercy included clergy, former cops, housewives and neighborhood folks with stories about the help he gave them. But there were others who weren't mentioned, guys with names like Crazy Joe and The Ox, the Hawk and the boys from Cicero. One of Vrdolyak's friends who couldn't make it as a character witness is former Chicago police Chief of Detectives William Hanhardt, currently in federal prison for running an Outfit-sanctioned jewelry heist crew. Hanhardt was the Outfit's top cop and de facto boss of the Chicago police when Fast Eddie was the de facto mayor years ago.”




Carol Marin in the CS-T, "Justice finally catches up to ‘Fast Eddie’".

“I couldn't stay away. Neither could dozens of my news colleagues. The resentencing of one of Chicago's legendary political wheeler-dealers filled a courtroom on the 21st floor of the Dirksen Federal Building on Friday. At issue: Would Edward ‘Fast Eddie’ Vrdolyak finally see the inside of a prison cell?

…I expected on Friday to see Betty Loren Maltese in the courtroom, but she didn't come. She, after all, hired Vrdolyak in the late '90s to help her run the town of Cicero when she was the president. Whatever his advice was, it sure didn't keep her out of the federal slammer. She did 6½ years of hard time in a rock pile of a prison in California while Vrdolyak went on to make many more millions.”



***


Matt Ridley in the WSJ, "Triumph of The Idea Smugglers".

“As so often in human history, the merchants who made the prosperity that paid for science were being crushed by the chiefs, priests and thieves who lived off it. Empires, built on trade, were killing trade. It is no accident that Fibonacci came from a free city-state run by merchants, Pisa, and lived in another, Bugia. Free city-states have been the laboratories of knowledge creation for thousands of years -- Tyre and Athens, for example….

As the philosopher David Hume was the first to observe, China suffers from a geographic disadvantage in this respect: It is too easy to unify. When disunited it grows rich and innovative. But time and again emperors, from the Ming to the Maoist, have been able to establish tyrannical centralized rule and shut down trade, diversity and experiment.

Europe, with its centrifugal rivers, its peninsulas and mountain ranges, is very hard to unify by conquest. Ask Constantine, Charles V, Napoleon and Hitler. So European states could harbor commercial, intellectual and religious refugees from each other, keeping flames alive.”



***


Patricia Cohen in the NYT, ‘Culture of Poverty,’ Once an Academic Slur, Makes a Comeback.


***


James Buchan in The Guardian on Peter Watson’s book, The German Genius: Europe’s Third Renaissance, the Second Scientific Revolution and the Twentieth Century.

“So, is there a German genius? Of course there is. Even Borges never suggested that Goethe's Die Leiden des jungen Werthers could have been written in Spanish, or Einstein's ‘Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper’ in English. Of all the answers assembled by Watson, the clearest comes from the American philosopher John Dewey in 1915, who summed up German civilisation as a ‘self-conscious idealism with unsurpassed technical efficiency and organization’. By idealism, he meant a belief that behind appearances or phenomena is some super-reality, sometimes called Geist, sometimes called Wille, sometimes even Musik. Whatever it is called, it speaks accurate German. The efficiency is for all to see. When I lived in West Germany, the Bundeswehr or federal army used to pretend to be a slovenly rabble, but nobody was taken in. When the Greens came into parliament in 1983, their wild costumes and warring ideologies could not disguise the most punctilious office habits. As for German self-consciousness, a British brigadier in Bielefeld once put it to me, in his staff-college drawl: ‘Vey do make wather a meal of being German, don't vey?’”



***


Matthew Kaminski in the WSJ on Timothy Snyder’s book, Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin.

“Both Hitler and Stalin dreamed of a new European order, one in the name of a master race, the other of a master class. Their visions met in the borderlands. In his use of political mass murder to achieve it, Stalin was the trailblazer, an elder statesman of terror. The Soviet-made famine of 1932-33, which killed more than three million Ukrainians, launched an era of horror that ended only with the end of the war.

Among his other goals in Bloodlands, Mr. Snyder attempts to put the Holocaust in context—to restore it, in a sense, to the history of the wider European conflict.”



***


Stephan Wackwitz at signandsight.com, "Save Benjamin from his fans!"

“The paradoxical entanglement of poetic consecration and scientific standards was however, prepared above all by Benjamin himself. He pursued the project of a sort of concretising theory. He believed that by describing a type of theatre, or novel, or form of architecture in as precise terms as possible, these things would be brought to life in ‘profane illumination’ and spawn a theory of their own. Benjamin, you could say, misinterpreted a Romantic poet's dream (‘And the world wakes up and sings, / If only you find the magic word’) as research programme. With Joseph von Eichendorff, it was a song that slumbered ‘in all things, / Ever dreaming forth unheard’ - whereas for Benjamin it was historical materialism. Herein lies the failure of his monumental and fragmentary lifework as scientific research and its enduring success as Romantic literature.”




***


Christopher Caldwell in the FT, " Government by search engine".

“In August, Google was reportedly activating 200,000 Android units a day. The potential market is measured in billions of users. Next to that, the bizarre stories about Google that broke this week may sound like small potatoes. Google has bought a stake in a wind-farm project. It is working on a driverless car. It has a ‘Google price index’ that measures inflation. But these are not publicity stunts or pet projects engaged in by ‘playful’ employees in their spare time. They are at the core of this innovative and troubling company’s mission…. Google is coming to compete, along an ever broader front, with government itself.”



***


Matthias Schulz in Der Spiegel, "How Middle Eastern Milk Drinkers Conquered Europe".

“Jens Lüning, a German archaeologist who specializes in the prehistoric period, was influential in establishing the conventional wisdom on the developments, namely that a small group of immigrants inducted the established inhabitants of Central Europe into sowing and milking with ‘missionary zeal.’ The new knowledge was then quickly passed on to others. This process continued at a swift pace, in a spirit of ‘peaceful cooperation,’ according to Lüning.

But now doubts are being raised on that explanation. New excavations in Turkey, as well as genetic analyses of domestic animals and Stone Age skeletons, paint a completely different picture:

-At around 7000 BC, a mass migration of farmers began from the Middle East to Europe. -These ancient farmers brought along domesticated cattle and pigs.
-There was no interbreeding between the intruders and the original population.

The new settlers also had something of a miracle food at their disposal. They produced fresh milk, which, as a result of a genetic mutation, they were soon able to drink in large quantities. The result was that the population of farmers grew and grew.”



***


Gurcharan Das in the WSJ on Robert Kaplan’s book, Monsoon: The Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power.

“To understand the 20th century, it was important to understand the map of Europe. When it comes to the 21st century, however, Americans are at a disadvantage because of an inherent bias in their mapping convention: Since the 16th century, when Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator developed a method of showing the globe as a flattened surface, Mercator projections have tended to place the Western Hemisphere in the middle of the map, splitting the Indian Ocean at its far edges. Yet the Indian Ocean encompasses a quarter of the world's surface and is home to half of the world's shipping-container traffic.”



***


Michael Wines in the NYT, "China Escalates Its Fight With U.S. on Energy Aid".

“In an abruptly scheduled news briefing here, the official, Zhang Guobao, sharply rebuked the Obama administration for opening an inquiry on Friday into the subsidies.

Mr. Zhang accused American trade officials of repeatedly delaying talks over the same issues that the White House now wanted to investigate and suggested the administration was playing election season politics.…

It is highly unusual for an official of Mr. Zhang’s standing to convene a news conference on short notice and denounce the American government in such blunt terms.
Should the Americans pursue the subsidy issue with the World Trade Organization, Mr. Zhang said, “the only ones who will be humiliated are themselves.”


Matthew Wald in the NYT, "A Bit More Ethanol in the Gas Tank".


***


David Dapice at yaleglobal.edu, "Once a Winner, China Sees Globalization’s Downside".

“The US position is that keeping the Chinese currency undervalued – by buying dollar-based assets with Chinese currency – will create dangerous bubbles in China. Indeed, there is massive overcapacity in housing, with one Chinese electric company reporting 60 million housing units connected and not using any electricity, so presumably empty. If another 20 to 30 million units under construction are added, China’s excess capacity could house the entire US population! Excess capacity in many commodities such as steel and even infrastructure add to the argument’s strength. China will find it very tricky to switch from exports to domestic consumption if there’s little need for housing or industrial expansion. It may be that a real slowdown is simply unavoidable in the next few years.”



***


Martin Wolf in the FT, "Why America is going to win the global currency battle".

“To put it crudely, the US wants to inflate the rest of the world, while the latter is trying to deflate the US. The US must win, since it has infinite ammunition: there is no limit to the dollars the Federal Reserve can create. What needs to be discussed is the terms of the world’s surrender: the needed changes in nominal exchange rates and domestic policies around the world.”



***


James Grant in the WSJ, on Michael Perino’s book, The Hellhound of Wall Street.

“For 10 days in March 1933, Pecora's investigatory target was Charles E. Mitchell, chief executive of National City Bank, later to become Citigroup. ‘Sunshine Charley,’ as Mitchell was mockingly known after his fall from grace, came pre-convicted, but his bank was a pillar of strength. Today, in the wake of the serial bailouts of 2008-09, Mitchell's managerial achievement seems almost mythical. From the 1929 peak to the 1933 depths, nominal GDP fell by 45.6%—the American economy was virtually sawed in half. By contrast, during our late, Great Recession, nominal GDP dropped by only 3.1%. Yet this comparatively minor perturbation sent Citigroup into the arms of the federal government to the tune of $45 billion in TARP funds and wholesale FDIC guarantees of the bank's tattered mortgage portfolio.

National City did accept a $50 million federal investment in 1934, after Mitchell resigned. However—and herein lies the difference—the bank's solvency didn't hinge on that cash infusion. Many banks did fail in the Depression, of course. But from today's perspective the wonder is that so many didn't.

To Pecora, though—and to Mr. Perino, too—the health of the National City balance sheet was not the question. Mitchell was a whipping boy from central casting….

Pecora went on to become an SEC commissioner, a judge on New York state's Supreme Court and a crusader for progressive political causes. Mitchell, who resigned in disgrace from National City and lost his houses to foreclosure, refused to file for personal bankruptcy. Rather, he honorably worked to pay every last dollar of debt. Later he built Blyth & Co into a thriving investment bank.

Mitchell or Pecora—who's your hero?”



***


Stephen Spruiell in The National Review on Paul Krugman.

“What happened to Paul Krugman that turned him into an example of the kind of writer and thinker he once lampooned? One explanation, according to a recent New Yorker profile, is that the 2000 presidential campaign ‘radicalized him,’ because ‘he perceived the Bush people telling outright lies’ about their plans to cut taxes, ‘and this shocked him.’ I know the feeling: Who doesn’t remember coming to the end of Bill Clinton’s presidency, that golden age of innocence, only to discover the shocking truth that politicians sometimes lie? But let’s take Krugman at his word. It is true, as Krugman alleged in his column at the time, that Bush used unrealistic surplus projections from the Congressional Budget Office to reassure the nation that his tax cuts wouldn’t plunge the nation into deficit. Krugman accurately noted that the CBO’s projections were based on highly unrealistic assumptions about how the economy was likely to perform (the air was already leaking from the tech bubble) and about how Congress was likely to behave (the projections depended on fiscal continence, but the GOP had already lost its way on spending). And Krugman argued that if the CBO’s projections turned out to be wrong, the nation would experience chronic deficits, insolvent entitlement programs, and, possibly, a sovereign-debt crisis.


If any of this sounds familiar, it’s because these are the things about Obama’s recently passed health-care-reform bill that radicalized the Tea Party.”



***


Paul Gregory in the Hoover Digest, adapted from his book, Politics, Murder, and Love in Stalin's Kremlin: The Story of Nikolai Bukharin and Anna Larina.

“His letter, addressed ‘Dear Koba,’ rambles, runs on at tedious length, and intersperses hysteria, anger, bitterness, and remorse with ambitious plans for the future. He describes his life in prison, writing as if to allay any concerns ‘Koba’ might have that he is being mistreated. (He has ceased going outside for exercise because he feels ashamed when other prisoners look at him.) The prison regime is strict: no feeding the pigeons, no talking in the corridors, no noises in the cell, a light burning day and night. But it’s also fair: the food is good, and the young jailers treat him decently.

Parts of the letter appear bizarrely inappropriate: ‘In my lifetime, I have known intimately only four women.’ At the end, the prisoner makes his plea: ‘Settle me in a hut somewhere outside of Moscow, give me a new name, let two NKVD officers live in my home, allow me to live with my family, let me work for the common good with books and translations under a pseudonym, let me till the soil.’ The letter ends: ‘My heart is breaking that this is a Soviet prison and my grief and burden are without limit. Be healthy and happy.’ The signature read ‘N. Bukharin.’

Nikolai Bukharin’s dear Koba was, of course, Josef Stalin, the uncontested master of the Russian house. Following his usual pretense of giving his deputies a voice, Stalin wrote on the border of a transmittal letter: ‘Circulate!’ and listed seven Politburo members as recipients of Bukharin’s plea. Their predictable reactions came back in a torrent: ‘the letter of a criminal’; ‘a criminal farce’; and ‘a typical Bukharin lie.’

Stalin was thus again obliged to bend reluctantly to the will of the party.”



***


Andrei Konchalovsky lecture at opendemocracy.net, "Update the software of the Russian soul?"

“The works of the church fathers Gregory of Nazianzus, John Chrysostom, Basil the Great and other holy people we revere clearly show that they knew both Greek and Latin and were utterly at home with abstract philosophical concepts. The theological schools in the early days of Christianity taught not just languages, but dialectics, scholasticism, rhetoric, not to mention geometry, astronomy, and even music too. The theological milieu might well be considered to have constituted the intellectual élite of Europe, even after the schism of Christianity. But the translation of the Bible into Slavonic by Cyril and Methodius, even given the colossal humanistic significance of that presentation of learning to the broad masses, had one vital shortcoming. Greek and Latin remained out of reach, along with the whole invaluable set of scientific tools. Those languages providing the key to the wisdom of the ancient world were practically unknown in Rus. This isolated Rus from the great European traditions of Graeco-Roman scholasticism, from the critical interpretation of any idea, including the religious. In Rus people had no conception of the political and legal culture of classical antiquity. This isolation from classical and medieval theological and philosophical thought largely contributed to the further schism of the Christian world. As the historians Karatsuba, Kurukin, and Sokolov write in their book Choosing One’s History (2005): ‘Rus failed to take account of the experience of Western European scholasticism, the experience of open theological discussion. The sign of authentic piety in Rus came to be ‘unreasoning reason’ (‘Do not dare to have an opinion’, ‘Do not read many books, lest you fall into heresy’).”



***




The World Policy Journal devotes most of its Fall issue to the question, "Is there a global canon?"


***




A Page of Madness (Teinosuke Kinugasa, 1926)

•Sat. Oct. 23 7:30pm
MoMA theater 1


***




L.A. Punk music photographer Donna Santisi interview on her re-issued book from 1978, Ask the Angels. And here’s another interview from her summer book event at Book Soup.


***




•October 24, 2010. Grace Krilanovich, reading from her novel, The Orange Eats Creeps, at KGB Bar.



Also reading at Word bookstore in Brooklyn, •Tue. Oct. 26.




***


Dan Barry in the NYT, "Who Was Annie?"


***


Obituary of the Week
Marzieh (1924 - 2010)

“In 1979, after the Shah was overthrown, Iran became a theocracy led by the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. The fundamentalist clerics who ran the country deemed the arts, including music, inimical to the new order. As an artist who was also a woman, Marzieh, doubly marginalized, was barred from performing. She retreated to her farm in the countryside and did not sing in public for a decade and a half…. During this period, the restrictions on female singers were relaxed to a degree, and Marzieh was told that she could appear before audiences of women only. She considered this stricture unacceptable, she later said, and continued her silence, practicing in private where no one could hear her. ‘I sang for the birds, for the river, the trees and the flowers,’ she told The Washington Times in 1995, ‘but not the mullahs.’



***


Thanks to Andy Schwartz, Jay Babcock, Steve Beeho.


















Carillon, DuPage River, Illinois

Photo by Joe Carducci























To receive a weekly update notice for the NV, send an email to newvulgate[at]sbcglobal.net with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line. To stop receiving notices, do the same with the word UNSUBSCRIBE.

• The New Vulgate
• Joe Carducci, Chris Collins, James Fotopoulos, Mike Vann Gray, David Lightbourne
• Copyright retained by the writer, artist, or photographer

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Issue #53 (July 7, 2010)

Mirror Lake, Snowy Range, Wyoming

Photo by Joe Carducci

















Drawing by James Fotopoulos
















From the Desk of Joe Carducci…
 
From “The Bad Guys” issue of Foreign Policy, Nathaniel Myers on Africa’s North Korea:

“With a population of just 5 million people, Eritrea has clashed with all four of its closest neighbors in the 17 years since it broke off from Ethiopia. Eritrea still keeps as many as 100,000 soldiers stationed along that frontier, just in case. Before that conflict, it fought Yemen over a chain of islands that lay between them. And just two years ago, Eritrea launched a brief, surreal attack on its tiny neighbor, Djibouti, in which some 35 soldiers from both sides died. Many of the deaths occurred when Djiboutian troops refused to hand over Eritrean soldiers who had defected -- whether in hopes of escaping hardship at home, finding better training abroad, or even just getting a few sips of clean water.

Eritrea has also periodically sponsored rebels in Ethiopia, Sudan, and Somalia, occasionally and unapologetically giving refuge to their leaders in Asmara.”

 
***
 
M.G. Zimeta in Prospect on the International use of Ethiopia against Africa.

“Indeed, was it ever in the Ethiopian government’s interests for NEPAD to succeed? Part of NEPAD’s mandate is to ensure good governance in African states, and the Ethiopian leadership is hardly a model of this. It has been accused of serious human rights abuses, persecution of political opponents, and anti-democratic governance. Human Rights Watch has called Ethiopia’s recent record ‘poor…and on a deteriorating human rights trajectory.’ The US State Department has cited reports of ‘unlawful killings, torture, beating, abuse, and mistreatment of detainees and opposition supporters by security forces, often acting with evident impunity.’ Foreign Policy magazine has just ranked Ethiopia’s prime minister Meles Zenawi the 9th worst dictator in the world, while the country’s opposition leader and former judge Birtukan Mideksa languishes in prison on a life sentence for treason…. Ethiopia therefore seems a strange choice to be the ‘voice of Africa’ in discussions about African development.”

 
***
 
Shannon Horst in the CSM, Africa needs a brown (not green) food revolution.

“Africa's once vast, healthy savannas were produced by the hoofs and manure of vast herds of grazing animals and pack-hunting predators. Turning those lands into crop fields will have the same effect it produced on the Great Plains of the United States – the collapse of the grasslands and the soil, river systems, and the groundwater supplies that lie beneath them. Consider the recent depletion of the Ogallala aquifer that lies beneath a large portion of the Great Plains.

Most of Africa's rural populations are pastoralists or agropastoralists who do not farm. Turning them into ‘productive farmers,’ dependent on foreign seeds and other inputs, is not only destructive to their land, it is destructive to their culture. Millions have already been spent by US and European aid organizations throughout Africa on unsuccessful farming programs. Pastoralists in the Horn of Africa consistently say that these programs have also been culturally destructive.”

 
***
 
Sreeram Chaulia at atimes.com on M R Narayan Swamy’s book, The Tiger Vanquished:

“Swamy elaborates through fresh revelations that the Congress Party-led coalition government in India played a crucial role in the LTTE's rout. The preceding regime in New Delhi under the Bharatiya Janata Party had covertly orchestrated the Norway-sponsored ceasefire agreement between Colombo and the LTTE in 2002. But the Indian establishment under Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Congress leader Sonia Gandhi, a woman widowed by Prabhakaran, progressively tilted towards the Sri Lankan government in the war's endgame….
The author lists Prabhakaran's hubris, ‘false sense of superiority’ (p lvii) and misreading of India and the West after September 11, 2001, as other fatal mistakes that brought down his empire in a gory climax. Had the Tiger boss correctly read New Delhi's preference for democracy, pluralism and human rights in the north and east, and liberalized his totalitarian rule, his dream of achieving freedom for Sri Lankan Tamils may not have been comprehensively extinguished.”

 
***
 
Anatol Lieven in the FT, Moscow has come in from the cold.

“Despite stabilising its economy, the Russian administration has come to recognise its failure to foster the kind of economic transformation that would give it the chance of surviving as a major power when its energy exports finally run dry. It now sees working with the west as critical to its hopes of economic transformation, not just because of investment and skills but because of the mindsets that could help Russia to overcome its culture of corruption and waste. Without such help Russia risks in the long run becoming little more than a provider of raw materials to the Chinese, and even a Chinese dependency – a picture that fills Russians with private dread.”

 
***
 
Alexei Levinson at opendemocracy.net on Russia’s Enemy-love.

“The research that our group conducted during the epoch of Gouache’s ‘new thinking’ uncovered an interesting mix of ‘new’ and ‘old’ thinking in the mass consciousness. Indeed, on the very eve of Gorbachev’s first speeches on the subject, the official Soviet line still held that ‘the world has never been closer to a nuclear war’. Almost overnight, everything changed, and former enemies became friends. We were eager to become part of the European set and even for a moment debated joining NATO. Such trends were naturally reflected in public opinion at the time: when we asked the public to name who Russia’s friends were, for example, it was common to hear ‘everyone’ as an answer….

The same surveys showed particularly interesting responses about Russia’s ‘enemies’. Discounting overspill from historical alliances (‘our enemies are the US, Germany, NATO, or ‘the West’’), there were three general responses — ‘no enemies’, ‘we are our own enemies’ and ‘there are enemies... the problem is that we don’t know who’. Today, our latest polls show the following answers: around 4% consider that Russia has no enemies; while about three times as many believe that Russia has no friends.”

 
***
 
Shireen Burki in CSM on the once and future Kingdom of Afghanistan.

“Afghans saw their king as fair and inclusive. Under Zahir Shah, the central government established Afghanistan’s first professional standing Army, yet generally left the provinces alone in their handling of day-to-day affairs. Kabul did not try to force its ‘modernization’ program upon the conservative elements, especially in the Pashtun belt inhabited by proud tribes who were deeply skeptical of anything ‘foreign’ being imposed on them. So memorable was this period that Afghans at the Bonn Conference in 2001, which was set up to plan the future of Afghanistan’s government, clamored to reinstate Zahir Shah and the 1964 Constitution that set forth equal rights for all Afghans before the law. Yet this broad desire was stymied.

What happened? Washington sought the counsel of certain expatriate Afghans with self-interested agendas in 2001 that had long divorced themselves from their people and culture. Their heeded advice did not mirror the hopes and aspirations of Afghans who had stayed behind to endure the brutality of the Soviets, the warlords, and then the Taliban.”

 
***
 
Mats Persson at euobserver.com, "What made Europe great?"

“The Treaty of Westphalia locked in this order, ensuring that sovereign states could continue to compete – also leaving them free to copy the advances of those that had enjoyed greater economic and social success. In contrast, China – with its once scientific and naval superiority – chose the path of a single, unified empire; a heavily centralised regime whose autocratic rulers faced little pressure to change their ways…. The consequences are well known: China’s economic revolution was delayed by some 500 years….

But there’s also another aspect of the Peace of Westphalia that is too often overlooked. The nation-state – the idea of territorial integrity and sovereignty – paved the way for the concept of popular sovereignty in Europe. The state became the unit around which democracy – the pre-condition for which is a demos – could be organised.

Europe’s history is of course much more complicated than this – geography is key, for example, religion is a major factor and the rise of the nation-state was coupled with wars and, at times, nasty expressions of nationalism.

Still, EU leaders would do well to glance backwards for a few minutes before deciding what do to next. The eurozone crisis is once again begging fundamental questions about Europe’s past and future.”

 
***
 
Tevi Troy in National Affairs, "Bush, Obama, and the Intellectuals".

“The term ‘intellectual’ took the place of the old-fashioned ‘man of letters’ sometime near the end of the 19th century — first among the French, and then the English and Americans. This difference in terms also reflects a difference in kind. A man of letters — while not necessarily a professor in a university — was a learned observer of the times, but tended to offer insights rooted in more timeless truths and principles. Drawing from a broad knowledge of the canon — of history, philosophy, science, literature, or art — he informed the views of other educated people about various social, political, or cultural issues of the day.

Modern intellectuals, too, are learned commentators on contemporary events. But they tend to be less concerned with a knowledge of the canon, and more fixated on these issues of the day, and often seek a mass audience in our mass democracy.”

 
***
 
Ruth Rosen in her piece, "Tea Party and the New Right Wing Christian Feminism", at opendemocracy.net, asks plaintively, “Who are these angry people who express so much resentment against the government, rather than at corporations?” She probably didn’t title her piece but she is flummoxed over the number of women in this “incoherent” movement, as she has it. The Left is so busy repairing their fantasy of a blithering, rural, racist front for the use of corporate power that they cannot see a major restructuring of their Republican enemy. It might have been a Democratic restructuring but they are too much the party of the state itself to adapt towards libertarianism. But the Left’s half-century of success in forcing religion and cultural issues generally out of public life and into the home has effected the Right; it now is closer to the Libertarian sense that these folk culture issues can take care of themselves, but only if the state’s mandate in these areas is shrunken. It should be clear that this alone will allow the state’s performance to improve in those areas where its authority must prevail. The Left sees no failure of government in recent developments and so there is no reform of Fannie Mae or Freddy Mac. And a James Surowiecki in the New Yorker duly ignores it, stressing instead American ignorance and predatory lendors which is like worrying about a faucet leak when the levee just broke. And they’ve just decided not to fix the levee. No wonder that though we’re assured that the Tea Party are mindless, Gerald Seib in the WSJ reports that the “Tea Party Message on Spending Is Gaining Traction.”

It’s all fine to argue now is not the time save and cut, but that time will soon come. President Obama himself has promised he’ll get to it.

The new terrorist threat wasn’t taken as a sign the state ought to refocus on the first things of state so as to do them better, either. In fact, 9-11 sent the Left into a civil rights mode against a non-forthcoming racist backlash, so they didn’t notice how that tap on the shoulder from unreformed unenlightened Islam moved the Right on women’s issues. That’s where all those women came from, Ms. Rosen.

Apparently the Libertarians do not recognize themselves in the Tea Party either. David Carr in the NYT looks over the firing of one of those Reason magazine Libertarians from the Washington Post’s on-line Conservo beat. Dave Weigel got fired for venting in some even weirder centrist-only chatroom for “liberals”, that wouldn’t even have Tucker Carlson sans bow-tie. Anyway even the sensibly hip Reasonist libertarians are exhibiting class-panic as they win the argument and stare agog as the great unwashed approach leaving their crucifixes, if not their guns, at home. The Left doesn’t want to win really; we’ve seen that before. Obama’s victory creates interference in how they prefer to view their own country as beneath them. Naturally they hate workers. Now we may find out whether the Libertarians can bear to win an argument if it means sitting down and listening to class enemies.
 
***
 
Catherine Rampell in the NYT, "They Did Their Homework (800 Years of It)".

“The economics profession generally began turning away from empirical work in the early 1970s. Around that time, economists fell in love with theoretical constructs, a shift that has no single explanation. Some analysts say it may reflect economists’ desire to be seen as scientists who describe and discover universal laws of nature.

‘Economists have physics envy,’ says Richard Sylla, a financial historian at the Stern School of Business at New York University. He argues that Paul Samuelson, the Nobel laureate whom many credit with endowing economists with a mathematical tool kit, ‘showed that a lot of physical theories and concepts had economic analogs.’ Since that time, he says, ‘economists like to think that there is some physical, stable state of the world if they get the model right.’ But, he adds, ‘there is really no such thing as a stable state for the economy.’”

 
***
 
Sean Collins at spiked-online.com on Daniel Ben-Ami’s new book, Ferraris for All.

“Concerns about the side effects of growth have existed for a long time, going back at least to the Romantic reaction against industrialisation. Ben-Ami argues that today’s situation is different: the restrictions placed on growth are more all-encompassing than ever before, and include environmental, moral and social limits. Ben-Ami builds up a picture of the various ways that growth is challenged. To my knowledge, Ben-Ami is the first writer to bring together the usually disparate discussions of the environment, happiness and inequality, and show how they all challenge the desirability of growth.

Ben-Ami maintains that, rather than challenging growth scepticism, the 2008 recession gave it greater impetus. The growth-sceptic outlook that prevailed prior to the downturn encouraged us to explain it by reference to unbridled greed, instead of structural economic factors. And this greed and excess were said to characterise all of us, not just a few bankers.”

 
***
 
William McGurn in the WSJ, "Wal-Mart Does Saul Alinsky".

“In the end, appeals to class warfare by opponents of the company just didn’t hack it with the community. Just before a crucial zoning committee vote, South Siders held a demonstration in which they wore Wal-Mart supplied T-shirts while blowing vuvuzelas….

No doubt for some this is more evidence of the false consciousness that our lumpenproletariat is prone to fall into. But is it? For all the would-be Alinskys out there, which form of community organizing is likely to deliver real hope and change to struggling neighborhoods like the Ninth Ward: the mostly government programs that young Mr. Obama fought for -- or the jobs and opportunities that come from the kind of investment Wal-Mart will be making?”

 
***
 
Exhibit A, The Mission Statement:

“The Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy is a Harvard University research center dedicated to exploring and illuminating the intersection of press, politics and public policy in theory and practice. The Center strives to bridge the gap between journalists and scholars, and between them and the public. Through teaching and research at the Kennedy School of Government and its program of visiting fellows, conferences and initiatives, the Center is at the forefront of its area of inquiry.”


Its useful for these explorers and illuminators to occasionally help prove that the New York Times, and by extension, the news media generally, is Conservative! Listen, it can be hard to get up in the morning -- one has to stop dreaming. Anyway, if you read their damning Abstract at the top of the report you’ll understand why the blogs went nuts; but if you read the report itself, "Torture at Times: Waterboarding in the Media by Harvard Students" [pdf file], you’ll yawn, turn off the light, and yes, Go to Sleep! The NYT has its own perverse interest in being accused of having been Bush’s pet, so their response to this calumny is somewhat casual.
 
***
 
David Whelan at Forbes.com on Michael Hastings' book deal with Little, Brown that his coup-counting with the General. It’s untitled for now. My suggestion is to call it: I Too Serve Who Punk for Jan.
 
***
 
From an archive of Kenneth Roxroth essays at bopsecrets.org:

Subversive Aspects of Popular Songs [1969]

“At the very beginning of the Middle Ages in Provence there grew up a vast literature of both written and sung poetry that reflected the life of a society more permissive than any to be seen in Europe until modern times. The songs of the troubadours have connections with the poetry of sexual mysticism which spread from India to Persia and across Islam to Muslim Spain. Their influence spread then to Germany, England, even to Constantinople. Whether it was part of the Albigensian heresy or not, the entire culture of Provence, the most civilized part of Europe, was obliterated in the Albigensian Crusade, the bloodiest war of extermination in the West until the invention of gunpowder. Today the influence of the troubadours on a few modern poet singers is apparent, but in the intervening centuries the connection was snapped. The same sexual mysticism can be found in the songs of Leonard Cohen or Anne Sylvestre, both of them strongly influenced by troubadour songs.

It is not surprising that the high bohemianism of the courts of France, Burgundy, and Italy should have developed forms of expression that owed so much to the poor bohemianism of the wandering students. The court of France’s most Renaissance king, François the First, was not unlike our modern jet set or the titled hippies of Way Out London. Bohemianism has been defined as the behavior of those who imitate the luxuries of the rich while lacking the necessities of the poor. If so, the high bohemianism of the rich simply imitates the counterculture of the dropped-out poor.”

 
***


[Lee Abrams, left, mid-crime.]

Phil Rosenthal in the CT on Lee Abrams. It wasn’t enough to destroy FM radio, and then disable the Tribune, now he’s out to sink the white whale of WGN radio and Television. "We're out to bust the TV cliches… Some of theses cliches are beyond belief." Thank the ghost of William Wrigley the Cubs have a new owner.

The official WGN Lee Abrams bio.

***



Amy Annelle has a new album released. It’s called “The Cimarron Banks”, and she’s doing a run of gigs in the area next weekend. She’s in Maine and Oregon soon too.

•July 9th - Friday at Matter Books, Fort Collins.
•10th - Saturday at the Titwrench Festival, Denver.
•11th - Sunday at the Buckhorn Bar, Laramie.
•12th - Monday Noon live-stream of KRFC FM - Fort Collins.

***

The Units “Warm Moving Bodies” film, or some posthumous version of it is up and quite good. It sent me back to their two self-released 45s. I thought I had their album but I guess not. They were a San Francisco band and we distributed all their stuff at Systematic -- the album was released by 415 Music which is probably a bad sign. 415 was Howie Klein and Chris Knab’s label and they had the kind of commercial ambitions that in those days doomed one to releasing crap or in any case taking what might be an interesting band and trying to process them into something that might fly by the second-guessed judgment of, you smelled it, Lee Abrams. The Units were one of those poorly served interesting bands. On their own at their best they were not fully coherent. They had a pretty good rock drummer who didn’t quite mesh with what Scott was doing on keyboards that were often rough and noisy. They kind of fell between being over the top-futurists like The Screamers and the classically tuneful as Voice Farm. We did pretty well with their singles and helped them run the second 45 though it was not an Optional Music release.
 
***

Marc Myers in the WSJ on the early crowd control issues at music festivals at music festivals, here the Newport Jazz Festival of 1960.

***






“The not-so Complete Clint Eastwood” at Lincoln Center still gives New Yorkers a chance to see a lot of good films on a big screen. The Richard Schickel notes pull Eastwood in an auteur direction when the whole point of his career is that he’s an acteur -- one who unbeknownst to his studio or Hollywood generally, could carry films and who, as an actor in “Rawhide” (1959-66) saw a parade of television journeyman directors routinely miss pictorial opportunities the actors saw all around them. Many television actors were famous for their contempt for how series television threatened to make mincemeat of their performances if not their careers, but Eastwood is the only one who beat the system by doing something about it. He isn’t to be lazily termed an auteur, though, or compared to John Ford or anyone else. Not when Hollywood was no longer what it was; in fact Eastwood returning a star from the International co-produced Sergio Leone westerns was taken as the signal proof that the old studio paradigm was comatose, and that some strange new audience Hollywood did not understand would accept, even demand, what Don Siegel meant when he said he’d never worked with an actor that cared less for his image.

This Eastwood series doesn’t include the Siegel/Eastwood films, Coogan’s Bluff (1969) or The Beguiled (1971), which are probably the most important films missing here. The comeuppance Eastwood’s Arizona deputy Coogan receives in Manhattan is quite wise and unexpected; the comeuppance he gets in The Beguiled is just plain perverse. The failure of The Beguiled, which each thought their best film and blamed on the studio’s falsely marketing it as an action film, changed or maybe forced the Eastwood template into being. The films got a little more formulaic and Eastwood’s hero a bit more inert. Still, genre is a strength and a lot of his smaller seventies and eighties films are exceptional, more so than the later award-winning “white elephant”-trending productions, although Gran Torino (2009) was a return to his old low-cost high-return genre-piece approach. All-told, Eastwood’s career is comparable in its winning ways to that of director Anthony Mann (a good Mann series is just winding up at the Film Forum) in that both Eastwood and Mann got to do or try everything in the way of genre or budget that a studio might back. Nearly uniquely they managed to use the studios as much as the studio used them. Eastwood’s films are not regularly as masterful as Mann’s but then Eastwood did not have a coherent studio-system behind him, which makes his achievement the greater.

In this Film Society of Lincoln Center’s series, don’t overlook the “lesser” Eastwood below (and find Coogan’s Bluff, and The Beguiled if you haven’t seen them).

Bronco Billy (1980)
Escape from Alcatraz (1979)
The Gauntlet (1977)
Honkytonk Man (1982)
Play Misty for Me (1971)
The Rookie (1990)
White Hunter, Black Heart (1990)

(btw, the rest of the Anthony Mann films at Film Forum are worth seeing and El Cid (1961), The Far Country (1955), and Men In War (1957) are the best.
 
***
 
Be nice to wake up tomorrow and find Dwayne Wade in a Bulls uniform. He’s local like Derrick Rose, which would make them unusual starters in the mercenary world of professional major league sports. But witness greater Cleveland’s pull on their own local boy LeBron James… American professionals do bond on occasion with each other and the city and the colors of their jersey. Why else does Utah insist on calling themselves The Jazz, or Los Angeles The Lakers? But a month after the playoffs the NBA free agency roundelay is all but keeping The New Yorker’s choice for the next American sport, Soccer, and its World Cup virtually invisible. Not that I don’t keep the games on now and then -- love that drone… It’s almost as good a noise as squeaking gym shoes. But Mike Watt summed up Soccer’s problem to me once when he laughed, “You can’t use your hands!” Yeah, it’s absurd if not diabolical. What’s a free people being encouraged to play and follow a sport like that for? What does Hendrik Hertzberg have in mind? He’s rooting for soccer in America but one can bet not for Team USA itself -- too gauche. It can be no accident, they’re so smart and all at The New Yorker.

Because the sports media and the NBA marketing strategy downplays the team imperative in favor of individual stars’ skills, the game is often misunderstood. But truth is there on the floor. And that is LeBron’s dilemma, and why I’d rather the Bulls wind up with Wade. LeBron is a phenom yes, but his misfortune is to not have been the unwilling second option on a championship team as a young man like Kobe was. And so he’s played so far as an inexperienced first-option who unravels his team’s best attempts to play together with every jaw-dropping individual feat. By which I mean to say that Kobe is wrong, he does not have five championships because by his own behavior he conceded those first three were Shaq’s. During the playoffs Charles Barkley called it during the Cleveland - Chicago series: He kept chiding LeBron and Cleveland for playing merely to beat the Bulls, not to tune up for the next series, where they’d have to deal with an older but much smarter Celtics team. Because of the history between the Bulls and Cavs LeBron joining the Bulls might be too much for a local Ohio boy to inflict on his home-state. They all say it's business so its anybody’s guess. But I did prefer the look on Dwayne Wade’s face when his Miami team lost to the Boston Celtics, than the look on LeBron’s when he too lost to Boston. The collusion of these free agents is an attempt to, as Dennis Scott put it, avoid winding up on the second or third best team in the east and be doomed never to reach the finals.

Incidently, due to the universal nonesuch of the Jordan-era Bulls it's often forgotten that for a mid-sixties expansion franchise, the Chicago Bulls have a great story Before Jordan as well. Some of it is recapped in this CT photo gallery. Missing are two more players who like Jerry Sloan and Norm Van Lier became coaches out of those early seventies Dick Motta years, Bob Weiss and Matt Goukas. It was a thinking team that played together, and Motta, who had come from college (Weber State) and said later that he didn’t realize until he hit Washington and then Dallas that the NBA wasn’t like that. Those Bulls were that exceptional a team. Only Lew Alcindor at Milwaukee and/or Kareem Abdul-Jabbar at Los Angeles kept those teams from a championship or two.

Bob Love was my favorite on the team; he’d back into the paint, then twist smoothly in place to face the rim for his jumpshot. He shot more with his elbows than his wrists, the ball well behind his head and virtually unblockable by any defender fronting him. His nickname was Butterbean; he stuttered and so couldn’t become a coach or a spokesman or even be interviewed post-game. At the time he was therefore kind of a mystery man. His speech impediment kept him from stable work until he was bussing tables in Seattle. His boss enrolled him with a speech therapist and he could talk by the time the Bulls were looking to retire his number and hire him as community liaison.
 
***
 


Obituary of the Week

Bob Probert (1965 - 2010)
 
***
 
Thanks Jay Babcock, Andy Schwartz.





















To receive a weekly update notice for the NV, send an email to newvulgate[at]sbcglobal.net with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line. To stop receiving notices, do the same with the word UNSUBSCRIBE.

• The New Vulgate
• Joe Carducci, Chris Collins, James Fotopoulos, Mike Vann Gray, David Lightbourne
• Copyright retained by the writer, artist, or photographer